logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.02.21 2017고단2545
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of lurged vehicles from Chumburged vehicles.

On October 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.209% in blood at around 22:40, and led to turn to the left from the ebbal-Eup on the right side of the eb.g., e., the e., the instant vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.209%.

At the same time, there was a location where signal lights are installed, so the driver engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant received the front part of the victim D(29 years old)'s Eflblur vehicle, which was left left from the north of the municipal ordinance due to the negligence of left-hand turn while neglecting this, in front of the above Aflur vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (F) who is the passenger of the franchise vehicle, for about two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, such as the franchise’s franchise’s franchise’s franchise’s franchise’s franchise’s b

2. On October 24, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 22:40, the Defendant driven the above Aburged vehicle at a approximately seven km section from around 7km to the place indicated in paragraph (1), while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.209% during blood.

Accordingly, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver involved and response to a request for appraisal;

1. Two copies of a medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Application of the CDA-1 statute

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3(2)8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (motor vehicle driving) concerning criminal facts;

arrow