1. The Defendant’s refusal to disclose information on July 31, 2018 to the Plaintiff as indicated in the attached Table 1.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 29, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against B as defamation under 2017 type No. 3273, supra, the lower court’s jurisdiction over the Chuncheon District Prosecutors’ Office, 2017, stating that B had damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing false facts.

B. In the foregoing case, the prosecutor rendered a non-prosecution disposition on November 29, 2017 that he/she was not authorized to institute a prosecution against B.

C. On July 30, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for a copy of the records in Articles 2017 and 3273 (hereinafter “the records of this case”). However, on July 31, 2018, the Defendant applied for a copy of the records in Articles 22 subparag. 2 of the Rules on the Preservation of Prosecution’s Office (hereinafter “the records of this case”). However, on the following grounds: (a) on July 31, 2018, the Defendant’s statement of the Plaintiff (23 pages); (b) notification of the result of the case processing (137 pages); (c) confirmation of the Plaintiff’s submission (140 pages); (d) additional data submitted by the Plaintiff (146 pages, 150 pages), revocation of the complaint (168 pages); and (169 pages); and (c) on the pertinent documents, the documents of which the list of the attached list was rejected due to disclosure of the records of this case’s reputation, privacy, safety of life, or peace and peace of investigation (hereinafter “the disclosure of investigation records”).

On September 4, 2018, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking partial revocation of the instant non-permission disposition.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the non-permission disposition in this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion may not allow the plaintiff's claim for perusal and copy of the information listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter "the information of this case") under Article 22 of the Rules on the Business of Preserving Prosecution, and the information of this case is listed in each subparagraph of Article 9 (1) of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter "Information Disclosure Act").