A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:00 on August 12, 2013, the Defendant heard the horses that “the business hours have expired” from the victim while drinking alcohol at “E” points operated by the victim D(33 years of age and inn) of the victim D(E) on the 5th floor of the Kasung City on August 12, 2013, or allowed the victim to sit at the front her seat, and then sound “one funeral at this end, one” and the victim’s face knife, one of which is dangerous things on the table, and the victim’s face is unfolded several times, following the victim’s left part, the lower part, the left part, the left part, and the part of the victim’s display site after the victim’s display, thereby damaging the victim’s 30,000 won away from the victim’s 2 week’s body, “damage and damage to the free will and injury of the victim’s 300,000 won.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each photograph;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the point of inflicting bodily injury upon a dangerous object: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 of the Criminal Act: Articles 369 and 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, each of the instant crimes is subject to strict punishment against the Defendant, taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant was faced with a cruel balance, which is a dangerous object; (b) the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim and damaged property; and (c) the nature of the crime is not good; and (d) the Defendant was punished for past violent crimes.

However, the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth thereof, and the victim agrees with the victim.