beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a teacher of middle and high school C in the Foundation B, and D is an administrative employee of C Middle and High School, who was the former president of B Foundation, and the victim F is a grandchild of the above E with his/her father of the above D.
On the other hand, some teachers and students of CJ high schools pointed out unfair practices such as E, and set up an emergency response committee in conflict with B foundation. In order to present their opinions on these issues, they convened at the same time and at the same place as indicated below.
On February 22, 2017, the Defendant displayed the victim’s photograph to H, etc., an apartment resident, who was convened at the entrance of the Daejeon Seo-gu G apartment on February 14:25, 2017, and is a resident of the apartment that asked a certain meeting, and presents the victim’s photograph. “F going in the childcare center”
This means F c and F d' or F d' or not
“The President of the Foundation B, a foundation which is a non-ried foundation of ASEAN,” and “The ASEAN was the President of the Foundation B.
The victim’s honor was damaged by publicly alleging the fact that the assistant principal requested KRW 100 million to the assistant principal and the dismissal was rejected.
Summary of Evidence
1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;
1. The legal statement of the witness H and the witness I's partial statement;
1. The closure of the comments on the screen and the family relation certificate [the witness H’s statement is not consistent, specific, and is not likely to be recorded differently, and credibility is recognized in light of the attitude of the statement in this Court.
Although H initially viewed the Defendant at the time, among teachers who were in conflict with the Incorporated Foundation B, female teachers, including the Defendant, included three persons (I record No. 11) and the increase in the number of pages (H record No. 16) explained by H, the victim could sufficiently have identified the Defendant.
The Defendant, at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation, “An young female son” and “Isson.”
“.....”