The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 15, 201, 201, a notary public made a notarized deed of promissory notes (hereinafter “instant promissory notes”) in the form of No. 3291, No. 3291, as to the issuer and C, the payee, the defendant, the face value 36,290,800, the issue date, November 15, 201, and the promissory notes (hereinafter “instant promissory notes”) in the form of the No. 3291, in accordance with the request of D by the plaintiff and the defendant’s employees representing both the plaintiff, C and the defendant.

B. At the time of the joint law office B/Dong, the notary public confirmed D’s power of attorney by means of the Plaintiff and C’s proxy form (hereinafter “the proxy form of this case”) and the Plaintiff’s certificate of the corporate seal impression and C’s personal seal impression form attached thereto, stating the purport to delegate all the powers regarding the issuance of the Promissory Notes to D at the time of

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap’s No. 1, Gap’s No. 1-3, and the purport of all pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not contain any issuance of the Promissory Notes, and there was no delegation of authority to commission D to prepare the Promissory Notes of this case.

The Plaintiff’s corporate seal affixed on the Promissory Notes of this case and the power of attorney of this case is forged.

Therefore, since the authentication of the Promissory Notes in this case is null and void, compulsory execution based thereon should not be permitted.

3. 판단 을 제1호증의 1, 2, 을 제3 내지 6호증, 을 제7호증의 1, 2, 을 제8 내지 10호증, 을 제11호증의 1, 2(아래 ⑤의 ㉠ 내지 ㉣항과 같은 리스약정서 작성 정황, 리스료 지급실태, 이후 원고가 취한 태도 등 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 각 진정성립이 인정된다)의 각 기재와 감정인 E의 인영감정결과에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들을 종합하면, 이 사건 약속어음과 이 사건 위임장의 각 원고 명의 작성부분은 당시 원고의 대표자였던 C의 의사에...