The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the fine of KRW 3,000,000, the confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected against the Defendant, and that the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment of a fine of KRW 500,000 in violation of the Military Service Act in 2014, and that there was no other criminal record is a reason to consider in determining the Defendant’s punishment.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic is a crime that commercializes women’s sex and harms the sound sexual morals of society; (b) the size of business and profit therefrom; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship; (d) motive and circumstance after the crime; and (e) various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial process, such as the records and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is excessively unreasonable. Thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.