logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.04.23 2019고단2134
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On September 20, 2018, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced a year of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on September 28, 2018.

1. No unregistered loan broker under defendant A shall receive brokerage fees, regardless of their names, such as fees, honorariums, and retainers, which are the consideration received in connection with loan brokerage, from the opposite contractual party to whom the loan is made;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, around April 14, 2016, extended loans of KRW 5 million to credit service providers D by arranging for loans of KRW 5 million, and received KRW 500,000 from the above C as brokerage commission, and received the brokerage commission of KRW 1,50,000,00 from the other party to a transaction who borrowed loans four times from that time until August 14, 2017, as shown in the attached crime list.

2. Defendant B

A. On September 7, 2017, the Defendant stated to the victim D that “if money is required to be paid, it shall be repaid after three months.”

However, the Defendant had already been obligated to pay approximately KRW 24.7 million in E, F, and G, while there was no special benefit or property, and the Defendant had been in the so-called “comforcing” where the interest on existing obligations was repaid with new obligations. Therefore, there was no intent or ability to repay money from the victim even if he/she borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 3 million won from the victim.

B. On October 20, 2017, the Defendant stated that “The husband who works for a private taxi is required to pay 10 million won, if he/she lends 10 million won to the victim D, he/she shall pay 2 months later.”

However, the defendant is the above facts.

For the same reason, there was no intention or ability to repay as promised.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 10 million won from the victim.

arrow