Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, as married couple, are operating E (State).

Defendants had previously been in possession of the victim F in receipt of a request for remodeling from the victim F to the vehicle of the head of the KX in 2015

In 2013, fooding MKX was remodeled to provide victims.

On April 23, 2015, the Defendants told the Victim F to “The Victim F to remodel the GKX-free 2015 Fooding 85 million won into the funeral vehicle” at H main points located in Gangseo-si G.

However, in 2015, he did not own food MX MX vehicles, which had been previously owned.

In 2013, there was no intention or ability to remodel the food vehicle to provide it to the victim because of the idea to remodel the fooding MX vehicle in 2015.

The Defendants: (a) deceiving the victim as such; (b) had the victim apply for an installment loan to the Aiju Capital on May 19, 2015; (c) sent to Aiju Capital a certificate of automobile manufacture that deleted the model year column with loan examination data; and (d) received a transfer of KRW 80 million to the account in the name of E (State) as the price for the vehicle at that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Recording of the witness F and I's statements in the third public trial records;

1. A new application form to be entered into and made on the Internet, and a new installment contract to be entered into;

1. A certificate of automobile manufacture and a certificate of automobile manufacture;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order

1. The Defendants’ summary of the assertion are that the victim would be remodeled into the vehicle of the head of the funeral in 2013 MKX vehicle.

be remodeled into a vehicle of the head of the funeral in 2015 only.

There is no fraudulent fact.

2. However, determination.