1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a taxi driver who operates Csi (hereinafter “instant taxi”) under the jurisdiction of the taxi transportation business entity B, a taxi transportation business entity.

On February 27, 2018, the head of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government issued a warning to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 16 (2) and (1) 2 of the former Act on the Development of Taxi Transportation Business (amended by Act No. 17453, Jun. 9, 2020; hereinafter “former taxi Development Act”) and Article 12 of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Taxi Transportation Business and Article 16 (2) and 2 (b) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Taxi Transportation Business.

피고의 후속 처분 (이하 ‘신고인’이라 한다)은 2019. 8. 11. 02:08경 피고에게 “신고인이 서울 용산구에 있는 용산소방서 이태원119안전센터 앞에서 이 사건 택시에 탑승하였으며, 서울 은평구에 있는 D아파트에서 하차하였다. 원고는 위 아파트에 올라가는 도중에 갑자기 미터기를 껐으며, 당시 미터기에 표시된 요금은 약 16,000원 정도였다. 원고는 목적지에 도착하여 요금을 결제하는 과정에서 갑자기 미터기 금액을 조작하였으며, 30,000원으로 결제가 되었다.”라고 신고하였다

(hereinafter “instant report”). On December 26, 2019, the Defendant issued a disposition to suspend the Plaintiff’s qualification for engaging in transportation business for 30 days pursuant to Article 16(2) and 12 subparag. 1(b) and 2(b) of the former taxi Development Act and Article 16(1)2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Taxi Transportation Business (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] The instant disposition should be revoked as it is unlawful for the following reasons: (a) the absence of dispute; (b) Gap evidence No. 1; (c) the entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 7, and 8; and (c) the Plaintiff’s assertion of the entire purport

A reporter shall be Russia.