logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.28 2016누96
변상금부과처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "the payment was made" of the third 5th of the judgment of the first instance; "the third 6th 6, 7 and 8 of the third 6th 1976"; "the registration of initial ownership" of the third 6th 6, 7 and 8 shall be as "the registration of initial ownership"; "the third 20th 3th 20" shall be as "the registration of initial ownership"; and "the third 20th 20" shall be as "the object"; therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial are not significantly different from the contents of the plaintiffs' assertion in the first instance court. Even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined, the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiffs' assertion is justified). 2. If so, the plaintiffs' claim in this case is groundless. Thus, the first instance court's conclusion is just, and therefore, the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent.

arrow