logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.05.23 2019고단171
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall receive 620,000 won from the defendant to B who is an applicant for compensation, and C who is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “Aphone 7 Popon phone is sold” by accessing the Internet H site at an off-site, and that “Aphone 400,000 won is remitted to the victim I who reported it.”

However, even if the defendant receives goods from the victim, he/she was thought to use them as living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to send his/her cell phone to the victim as agreed with the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and being transferred KRW 400,000 from the victim to the J account (K) under the name of the Defendant on the same day, was transferred from that time to January 6, 2019 by the victims totaling KRW 1,653,00,00 from that time.

"2019 Highest 598"

1. On July 22, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter “sale of Aphone 8 Pphones” on LM car page, and expressed that the Defendant would send the said mobile phone to the victim N who contacted 650,000 won if he/she remitted the amount to 650,000 won.

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods from the victim, he was thought to use it as a living cost, and there was no intention or ability to send the cell phone to the victim.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 650,000 won from the victim’s P account in the name of O.

2. On August 1, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “Aphone8 (64) is sold” in LM car page, and said that the Defendant would send the said mobile phone to the victim R who reported and contacted the fact that he/she remitted KRW 750,000 to the victim R.

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods from the victim, he was thought to use it as a living cost, and there was no intention or ability to send the cell phone to the victim.

The defendant.

arrow