1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional statements, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] 12-16 of the 6th 16th 1 of the 6th 10th 16th 1 of the 6th 10th 1st 16th 1st 16th 2th 1st 200 of the 1st 201th 3th 3th 16th 2th 3th 2000, “the plaintiffs asserted that M is fright and registered in three names, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.” If the above assertion is followed, its content is not understood harmoniously as it includes K’s 1/3 1/3 1/3 7th 7th 7th 7th 200. The plaintiffs stated that the guarantee submitted at the time when registration of preservation of ownership was made in three names under the above special measures, but the defendants did not dispute that they did not manage each land listed in the separate list, and therefore, the Daejeon District Court's 2015th 4139th 2015.

However, the Plaintiffs’ false letter of guarantee is difficult to accept as it is difficult to view that the Plaintiffs’ false letter of guarantee is a false letter of guarantee to reverse the presumption of registration under the Act on Special Measures when comprehensively considering the aforementioned reasons.

The part of the plaintiffs' assertion regarding the establishment of the defendant's clan in Daejeon District Court 2015Kadan41319, each of the defendant's clans at the time of registration in accordance with the Act on Special Measures is listed in the attached list.