1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s principal claim against the Defendant and the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s counterclaim.

1. The parties' assertion

A. On March 28, 2012, the Plaintiff’s assertion (principal suit) entered into a contract with the Defendants on the output and contact of KRW 3,345,00 of the proportional representation promotional materials of D parties, and the Plaintiff incurred damages of KRW 24,254,169, and KRW 14,907,724, totaling KRW 39,161,893, on the wind that the Defendants omitted 970,555.

B. Defendant C’s assertion (Counterclaim) that the Defendant supplied the Plaintiff a total of KRW 3,345,000 equivalent to KRW 87,00,000,000, and thus, the Plaintiff paid KRW 27,000,000 that the Plaintiff did not pay, and KRW 30,000,000,000, out of the lawsuit of this case, should be paid.

2. The judgment and counterclaim are not sufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s principal lawsuit and the Defendant C’s counterclaim claim on the sole basis of the descriptions of health class, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 10, and Eul’s evidence No. 1 through 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

(E) According to the above evidence, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed on November 29, 2014 on the condition that Defendant C pay KRW 3,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and that Defendant C not be liable for the instant promotional material supply contract should not be held liable for the instant promotional material supply contract). 3. As such, the Plaintiff’s principal claim against the Defendants and the counterclaim claim against the Plaintiff by Defendant C are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.