beta
Text
1. An attached will written by the deceased G (H birth, death on October 29, 2018) on July 16, 2018 shall be valid.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
The Plaintiffs and the Defendants are children of the network G (hereinafter referred to as “the network”).
The Deceased died on October 29, 2018.
Plaintiff
B, after the death of the deceased, on February 12, 2019, the Jeju District Court 2018 Ma10300, Jeju District Court applied for the approval seal of the testament certificate. On July 16, 2018, the testamentary book of the deceased on July 16, 2018, which was subject to the approval seal, was written as shown in the attached Form, and the testament of the deceased on the title "the testament book" includes the full text, preparation date, address and name of the deceased, and the seal of the deceased on the right side of the name of the deceased is affixed.
(hereinafter the above will (hereinafter referred to as the "the will of this case") / (which is the ground for recognition) without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (which includes a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the will based on the written self-determination certificate of intent of the entire pleadings is to be signed and sealed by the testator (Article 1066 of the Civil Act). The full text and date of the will of this case, the date of preparation, the name and address of the deceased, and the name and seal of the deceased are written in the will of this case. The fact that the seal of the deceased is affixed is as mentioned above, and if the purport of the whole pleadings is added to the statement No. 5, the several statements of the will of this case are all written by the deceased.
Therefore, the deceased’s will under the testamentary document of this case is valid as satisfying the requirements of a will by a self-certificate. The plaintiffs are entitled to seek confirmation of the validity of the testamentary document of this case against all the Defendants, who are co-inheritorss of the deceased, in order to eliminate any apprehensions and risks existing as a donee’s rights or legal status.
I would like to say.
(If the plaintiff's primary claim is justified, the plaintiff's primary claim shall not be examined. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.