Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive, demand or promise to use or manage the access medium.

Nevertheless, on August 30, 2017, the Defendant would provide 700,000 won per day from a person who was in fact of his name from a person who was in fact of his name using Kakao Kakao Kakao Stockholm at the same time of friendly birth in Seoul.

“After receiving and consenting to the proposal to the effect that “, on the same day, sent a physical card (C) connected to the post office account (C) in the name of the Defendant at the store distribution company near the new forest shooting distance located in the Seoul forest-dong on the same day, and sent the above name to the above party and notify the password of the said account using the Kakao Stockholm.

Accordingly, the defendant promised to receive the price and lent the electronic financial transaction access media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as account transactions;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is for the defendant to receive the price and lend the check card to a person with no name. The above crime is not very good because the access media, such as the check card, can be used for another crime with great social harm and injury, such as voiceing, etc.

In fact, the Cze Card that the Defendant lent was used for the singishing crime.

However, the defendant seems to have led to the confession of crimes and to reflect the wrongness.

The defendant does not seem to have actually received any consideration.

The defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime.

In the above circumstances, the defendant's person.