logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.06.07 2018나10884
건물등철거
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that of the court of first instance except for an additional determination under paragraph (2) as to the argument emphasized by the defendant by filing an appeal, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The defendant's ground for appeal is not significantly different from the argument in the judgment of the first instance, and the facts finding and determination of the first instance court are recognized as legitimate). 2. The defendant asserted that the defendant did not have received a demand for the payment of rent from the plaintiff, and that he could not pay rent because he did not know the contact address of the plaintiff. Then, the plaintiff visited the defendant's house around 2016, and there was no defendant's absence and left the plaintiff's phone number for the plaintiff's child. 2 The defendant called the plaintiff's phone number as above. 2 The fact that the defendant called the plaintiff's phone number as above and reads the above facts, is not a dispute between the parties, and it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff's house visit the defendant's house located in Ulsan Jinsan-do to demand payment of rent. 2. In addition, considering that the defendant's phone number was known of the plaintiff's telephone number and thus the plaintiff's intention and ability to pay rent, the defendant did not know that the contract was terminated or terminated. 2.

arrow