logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.05.26 2015고단382
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on November 2, 2006, and a fine of three million won for the same crime in the same court on November 9, 2012, respectively.

On March 11, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant driven B car with alcohol content 0.083% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front day of the main Naba-ri located in the Mineyang-si, Gamyang-si to the front day of the Naba-ri share located in the same Ri.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's written statement related to traffic accidents;

1. Report on proper launch of drivers, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. The actual survey report and photographs of traffic accident evidence;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copy of judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (hereinafter referred to as the following grounds for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. are as follows: although the Defendant had the same kind of power twice, it is relatively old and has been sentenced to a fine, and considering the fact that this case of drinking alcohol is not significantly high and is against the law.

arrow