A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On July 21, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on July 21, 201, and on October 29, 201, the judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 201. On July 24, 201, the Defendant filed a petition for a summary order with the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around September 18:15, on September 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two or more times, and the Defendant driven a D-A-hurd-hurd-hurd-hurd-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hurg-hur

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving a DNA lurged vehicle.

On September 18:15, 2013, the Defendant continued the front way of the new bank located in Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si on the speed of about 30 kilometers a speed of 30 kilometers a speed from the boundary of the central market.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure safety distance to avoid a collision with the motor vehicle ahead of it, and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant breached the above duty of care, and was negligent in operating under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license, and the victim E (the age of 23) prior to the same room was driven by the same room, and the Defendant was able to look back to the front part of the Frad-pured vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant is a victim by occupational negligence as above.