Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the father of the victim B (V, 25 years old) and the victim C (V, 23 years old).

On December 7, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim C by cutting off the vessels of the victim, cutting down the arms, cutting down the neck, cutting down the neck, and cutting down the neck, on the ground that the victim was b01 at the residence of the Defendant, Maba-gu, Mab01, Maba-gu, Maba-gu, Mab01 on December 7, 2013.

B. The Defendant received a decision to take ad hoc measures to prevent the victim B from entering the above residence until February 16, 2014 due to the above criminal facts.

Nevertheless, at around 20:00 on January 8, 2014, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, took a bath on the ground that he was unable to find employment for the victim, and assaulted the victim with the clothes of the stroke material of about one meter in length.

2. The conclusion of the judgment is the case falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement written by the victims, it is recognized that the victims submitted a written agreement to the effect that they would not wish to punish the defendant on July 22, 2014, which is the date of the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.