logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.11.19 2020나238
손해배상
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

Plaintiff’s assertion

and Determination

A. On May 18, 2019, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to be supplied with the part of the Defendant for the bathing room remodeling work of the housing located in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant construction work”) owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant contract”). On May 22, 2019, the Defendant supplied a painting to the wall surface on the instant construction site on May 23, 2019, the wall surface construction work was completed on May 23, 2019.

However, the contract of this case where the plaintiff agreed to be supplied by the defendant was two colors as shown below, and the defendant supplied only to the Jinsday, unlike the agreement, as the defendant supplied only to the Jinsday, so the work worker completed the above construction only to the Jinsday. Thus, the plaintiff's removal and reconstruction must be completed and the cost of reconstruction requires three million won. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay three million won as compensation for damages to the plaintiff.

Type 30 x 60 AJJ 893A (L. GR) with a luminous luminous size(c) model cm (1-mark) model 30 fluorum color fluorum fluorum fluorum fluorum fluorum 893E (D. GR.) wall (3 pages) fluorum 30 x 60 x 60 AJ 893A (L. GR).

B. In full view of the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize that the object agreed to be supplied by the Plaintiff to the instant contract is not a kind of coloring that the Defendant actually supplied, but a brightness coloring, as alleged by the Plaintiff, is included. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant violated the terms of the supply agreement of other days under the instant contract is without merit.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow