logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.09.10 2013고정2878
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On June 27, 2013, at around 04:41, Defendant A damaged the property by cutting a decoration which is favorable to KRW 280,00,00 to the victim’s own blue value with the victim’s D, which was operated by the victim D of the second floor in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, without any justifiable reason, while the victim D, was drunk with Defendant B, which was the same kind of blue and blue with Defendant B.

B. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties at around 05:00 on June 27, 2013

B. The police officer F, police officer F, and police officer G who called to the site after receiving 112 report at the front corridor of the E branch office of the E branch office of the State in this paragraph, were drunked to the police officer F, police officer G without any justifiable reason, and the above A.

When G police officers kept the victim of paragraph G with her her her her her her her her her her, he/she she her her her her her her her her with his/her her her her her her her her her her with his/her her her her seat

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by police officers dealing with 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B is the above 1. A.

At the same time and place as in the same paragraph, H, F, and Police Officers arrested Defendant A, who is one of their own f, and f, her f, and cherbed off her f, and her f, and her f, her f, her f, and her f, her f, and her f, her f, and her f, her f, with their body, her f, her f, her clothes, and her f, her f, with their clothes, her f, and her f, her f, with their body, her f, with her hand, her f, with his her f, with his her f, and with her f, with his her b

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers dispatched to the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the F, G, H, and D;

1. Application of the statutes governing the pictures of this case, including damage to property;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of causing property damage) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties)

B. Defendant B: Article 136 of the Criminal Code.

arrow