Defendant

A A Fines of KRW 3 million, Defendant B of a fine of KRW 1 million, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, and I of the fine of KRW 500,00,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. M apartment buildings, such as motive for crime, are built in a small scale of 37 households after removing 22 households above ground row houses, and at least 90 percent of the progress of construction in the instant case.

Defendant

A and N hold a part of the share in the above rebuilding apartment, and the damage was caused by the dispute with the union, and some of the terms of the contract have not been fulfilled.

Defendant B had Defendant B as a person in charge of the field supervision, and had Defendant C et al. receive daily allowances and let Defendant C et al to occupy the site, and committed the following crimes.

2. Defendants’ intrusion on structures, damage to property, and obstruction of business

A. From 13:00 on December 19, 2016 to 10:00 on December 26, 2016 (Provided, That from 11:10 on December 23, 2016 to 25:30 on December 23, 2016, Defendant C conspiredd to sell an apartment house at the owner of the said office, to 16:00 on the same day from 11:0 on December 23, 2016 to 21:0 on the same day; Defendant D opened up to 21:00 on the same day from 11:0 on December 23, 2016 to 200 on the same day; Defendant F opened the apartment house at the owner of the said office from 10:0 on December 23, 2016 to 20:20 on the remainder of the apartment house at the owner’s entrance or the remainder of 2:0 on December 24, 2016.

As such, the Defendants conspiredd with the office of the victim association.

B. During the period of intrusion into the sale office, such as the foregoing paragraph (a)(b), the written indictment stated “influence” as “influence,” but this court partly modified the expression of this part of the facts charged in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.

Defendant

A, B, G, H, and I shall be accompanied by a letter of view in collusion.