logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.08.28 2015가단70955
청구이의
Text

1. Compulsory execution based on the payment order issued on December 10, 2014 by the Defendant’s Changwon District Court against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Although the Plaintiff purchased a crime prevention alarm from B on November 1, 2002, the Plaintiff failed to pay the amount because the crime prevention alarm was broken and B does not cause defect repair.

After that, the plaintiff considered that there was no contact from B to waive the price.

However, inasmuch as the Defendant received the above payment claim from B and received the payment claim against the Plaintiff on December 10, 2014 from the Changwon District Court 2014 tea8097, the extinctive prescription of the claim for the payment claim has already been completed, the Plaintiff is entitled to be dismissed from compulsory execution based on the above payment order.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow