(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.05.10 2016고단3265

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.05.10 2016고단3265

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2016, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the victim’s left chests by talking to the victim E (M, 23 years old) in front of the “D” in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si on December 4, 2016.

[The defendant and his defense counsel held that the defendant's second arms and paths may contact the defendant's hand, but did not intentionally commit an indecent act against the victim's body.

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the above argument is without merit, since the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he had the left chest of the victim who committed an indecent act at the time and place of the crime.

① The victim stated the fact of damage in a very consistent manner between the police and the prosecution.

In particular, the Defendant tried to escape from the victim's bodily injury. The Defendant did not immediately deprive the victim of his her son and let the victim stay his son on the chest of the victim, and as they were used, the Defendant had the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son'

statement.

② CCTV images include: (a) the form of the Defendant’s selling to the victim in the form of double arms; and (b) the form of the victim’s selling to the victim, even after having contacted the victim; and (c) the victim’s selling to the victim.

(3) The injured party asked him to sound on the job immediately after he was committed an indecent act, inform the witness at the scene of the location of the criminal defendant's daily activity and the injured party's daily activity concealed the defendant.

(4) The victim did not have a personal identification with the defendant, and there is no reason to suspect the credibility of the victim's statement in order to mislead the defendant, and there is no reason to suspect otherwise.

(5) The defendant shall be subject to the initial investigation.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2019.08.23 2019노20

-수원지방법원 2020.01.09 2019노2306

-수원지방법원 2019.12.13 2018노7738

-대구지방법원 2017.09.08 2017노2733

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.14 2019노221