logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고단1540
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:20 on April 30, 2014, the Defendant expressed that, at the front of the Gwangjin-gu Residents' Sports Center located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Squadong, the Defendant was asked to ask questions about the circumstances of the case from the slope C, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station B district, who was called by a male at the time of female, who is a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station B district, and assaulted the above C at one time on the right-hand face of the said C.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] Crimes of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties [decision of the recommended area] [decision of the recommended area], six months to one year and four months; and

2. The decision of sentence shall be made in accordance with the text, taking into consideration the overall circumstances shown in pleadings, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and others, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and is against himself, there is no history of punishment imposed or beyond the fine for the

arrow