1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) using the second 18th of the judgment of the court of first instance as a witness of the court of first instance; and (b) adding the following judgments under the third 9 second 9 second 9 as a witness of the court of first instance; and (c) citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

In addition, the plaintiff asserts that even if the defendant did not grant the right of representation for the conclusion of the supply contract to E, the defendant bears the burden of representation pursuant to Article 125 of the Civil Code, so further determination is made about the plaintiff's conjunctive assertion.

According to the above evidence, the defendant allowed E to use the name cards that the defendant company's business is named as "specialized fire fighting business", and the defendant allowed E to use the name cards that the defendant company is named as director of the defendant company, and it can be acknowledged that E presented the above name to the plaintiff and the plaintiff supplied the fire fighting pumps, etc. at the construction site of this case. Thus, it can be acknowledged that the defendant indicated that he granted the right of representation to the plaintiff and entered into a supply contract for the fire fighting pumps, etc

Although the defendant alleged that the plaintiff knew or could have known that he had no authority to act for the defendant, there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

Therefore, even if the defendant did not confer the power of representation for the conclusion of a supply contract to E, the defendant bears the responsibility of representation under Article 125 of the Civil Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.