logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.04.06 2015고정223
주민등록법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 1, 2014, the Defendant filed a false report on the resident registration by filing a move-in report as if he/she had no intent to reside in “E and A 204” in the Chungcheong City, Chungcheongnam-si, and as if he/she had resided therein, the Defendant filed a false report on the resident registration.

2. The following circumstances recognized by the records on the market, namely, ① the complainant of this case, made a move-in report with the permission that the Defendant delayed the process of delivering the civil procedure with him/her:

Although the defendant asserted that he was present at the time of the investigation of this case and received an investigation after the investigation, and that the accusation was revoked by agreement with the complainant. As alleged in the above, if the defendant had made the move-in report of this case to delay the delivery procedure of civil procedure, he would have not been required to cooperate with the investigation procedure of this case, or to attempt to reach an agreement with the complainant, and otherwise, it is difficult to find any motive to file the move-in report of this case, and ② there is no electric, water, gas, and gas use details as to E, A, Dong 204 at the same time, but there is no way to live in the above house.

It is difficult to conclude that the above housing was built by G, which is the husband of the Defendant, and the Defendant was unable to live in “Seoul Gangdong-gu H and 2 Dong 101”, which is an existing domicile due to difficulties in living during the construction process of the above housing, and the Defendant moved to the residence of the above housing and left his children’s back and living in Seoul-friendly family where his children reside, while living together with the above housing and Seoul-friendly family.

As the defendant is argued, it seems that he does not actually reside in the existing domicile, and the family members of the defendant who has maintained a separate living together make a move-in report in the relatives' house also inappropriate for social norms.

arrow