logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017가합1275
공탁금 출급청구권 확인
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiff (appointed party) shall claim for payment of the total amount of KRW 662,785,500 in the attached list.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant deposited the expropriation compensation by designating D, the owner of each of the land listed in the separate sheet pursuant to Article 40(2)2 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (hereinafter “each of the real estate in this case”), as the housing redevelopment association that obtained the authorization of establishment pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents for the purpose of housing redevelopment by using the Seongbuk-gu Seoul and 1008 parcel as the business area, both Seongbuk-gu Seoul and 1008 parcel, as the owner of the land

B. D, registered as the owner of each real estate of this case, died on December 7, 1968.

D Family members of E were the spouse E and children F, but E died on December 9, 1989, and F was considered as deceased on October 20, 1990 by the Seoul Family Court on August 31, 195, with the expiration date of the period of disappearance as the date of August 31, 195.

C. G, E’s birth, died on April 29, 199. G’s spouse H died on April 2, 2010, and Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Appointors (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) collectively are children of G.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including virtual number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, E succeeds to the property of Eul, G succeeds to the property of Eul, and the plaintiffs jointly succeed to the property of G 1/4 each. Thus, the right to claim for payment of each of the deposits in the attached list attached to D with the deposited party shall be deemed to belong to the plaintiffs each 1/4.

(A) Although the Defendant asserts to the effect that G is the only sibling of E, G shall be deemed the only sibling of E, in full view of the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings expressed up to now, G shall be deemed the only sibling of E).

arrow