1. The part against the plaintiffs, which orders payment under the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 5, 2003, the parties concerned: (a) on December 5, 2003, Plaintiff A received a confection of a conical signboard at a Tol University Sylick Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); and (b) Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A.

B. Plaintiff A’s internal clinic and Defendant hospital’s medical examination (1) around September 2003, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital on 9 October 2003, 203, when the radioactive examination was conducted in a private hospital with severe radiation pains and the left-hand side, and after receiving physical treatment, the symptoms were presented, but the symptoms were not shown.

(2) The plaintiff A showed a positive response in 60∑ 60, although it was normal to keep on the right as a result of the non-performance test conducted on October 9, 2003, and the left-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-hand-hand-on-hand-on

Since then, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital conducted the MRI test for the plaintiff A, diagnosed the plaintiff as the 5th century-1,000 pharmacologic and performed pharmacologic treatment.

(3) On November 5, 2003, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital hospitalized the Plaintiff A in order to implement the selective neutism, and even though it was normal at the time of hospitalization that the Plaintiff did not keep to the right, the left-hand side did not have a positive response in 45∑ 45 degrees. As a result of the Domical History Test, the left-hand part of the Domical leutism was class 3, and the remainder was class 5, and there was low symptoms that did not result from the lautism test.

(4) On November 7, 2003, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital implemented the selective neutism against the Plaintiff on the part of November 7, 2003; however, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had been hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on December 4, 2003, where the radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive radioactive c

C. (1) Medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital were to conduct the instant surgery on December 4, 2003.