logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.03 2015나19208
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) this court's explanation is as follows: (b) this court's explanation is identical to the part of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, except where "the court" of the first instance is referred to as "the court of the first instance" as "the court of the first instance," and (c) this Court's explanation is citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment to the 5th page 1] “The ordinary wage is a concept under the Labor Standards Act to calculate the allowance for pre-determination of dismissal, extension, night and holiday work allowance, annual paid leave allowance, etc.” (see Article 6 of the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standards Act). [The addition to the fiveth page following the last behavior] dispute to the effect that the Defendant cannot recognize the Plaintiff A’s subsequent disability due to the accident, while the appraiser had already judged the contribution rate of 50% by taking into account the 5th class change of the retirement, and there is no other circumstance to see that there is any error in physical assessment, it is recognized as above according to the results of physical commission to the head of the Sinhee University Hospital at the court of first instance.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow