beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendants’ gambling
A. On December 23, 2013, the Defendants, along with E, F, and G on December 23, 2013, carried out gambling with “I” entertainment tavern located in Gangseocheon-gun, Gangwon-do, by using 52 cards, distributed 1,00 won on one card up to three occasions, and distributed 1,000 won on one card by using 52 cards, and then cut up up up to half of the total amount every time when he/she exchanges the card, and then gambling “one-name Ba” was carried out by a person who is low in the form of card and number.
B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendants of gambling with E, F, G, and J as well as E, F, and J around December 31, 2013.
In entertainment bars such as the entry in the port, one-person “abiopid” was gambling in the above way.
C. On January 1, 2014, the Defendants of Gambling with E, F, and G around January 1, 2014.
In entertainment bars, such as the entry in the port, one-person “biopia” was gambling in the aforesaid manner.
On February 3, 2014, the Defendants ambling with K, L, F, and G, and from February 3, 2014 to February 23:3:00 of the same day, the N’s house located in Gangwon-gun M from Gangwon-do to February 3:3:30 of the same day, the Defendants ambling one by the aforesaid method.
2. Defendant B’s gambling Defendant B along with F, E, and G: (a) around January 4, 2014, Defendant B’s rest 1.
In entertainment bars such as the entry in the port, one-person “abiopid” was gambling in the above way.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the protocol of police statement to theO;
1. The main sentence of Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, have shown an attitude of breaking their errors in the confession of each of the crimes in this case. However, each of the crimes in this case is committed.