logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고정2219
강요등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the representative director of Defendant B in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the management service company of Jung-gu.

1. Defendant A

A. As of April 30, 2013, the Defendant forced and detained the Defendant: (a) was notified by the management body of the termination of the consignment management contract; (b) was under the management body and lawsuit; (c) was determined by the victim G (n) who was in the process of the management body and lawsuit; (d) was in excess of the materials indicated in the management expenses, etc. of the State B; and (e) was notified to the victim as of October 31, 2013, around October 17, 2013.

At around 13:30 on October 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) arranged personal belongings in the above (ju) B B’s 11th floor management office; (b) opened the entrance door to the meeting room inside the above office; and (c) claimed that there is materials of (ju)B in the above stuff by opening the entrance door in hand; and (d) confirmed the width and e-mail under an agreement from now to 17:4 hours after opening the meeting; and (b) opened a personal e-mail by causing the victim to open the private room on his/her book; and (c) opened the personal e-mail from the victim’s computer to the victim’s personal e-mail search; and (d) opened the above e-mail for 17 hours from the victim’s day to the day of the above e-mail search; and (e) opened the e-mail from the victim’s e-mail.

Accordingly, the defendant, by intimidation, let the victim do an unobligatory act, and detained the victim.

(b) Any corporation which intends to carry on security business for violation of the Security Services Industry Act shall specify security business to be carried out under a contract and obtain permission from the commissioner of the district police agency having jurisdiction over the location

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 1, 2013.

arrow