1. The Defendant stated in the separate sheet [Attachment] in the aggregate of the difference amounts to the Plaintiffs, and on April 16, 2016, respectively.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: U urban environment rearrangement project - Public announcement: V of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 26, 2012 - Project implementer: Defendant;

B. Decision of expropriation made by the local Land Tribunal on February 26, 2016 - Land Tribunal on February 26, 2016 - Land on each item of expropriation owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each item of the instant land”), each item of obstacles (hereinafter “each of the instant partitioned buildings”), each of the instant land, each of the instant obstacles, each of the instant partitioned buildings, and each of the instant partitioned buildings; “each of the instant land, each of the instant obstacles,” “each of the instant land, each of the instant divided buildings,” “Seoul Mapo-dong” and “Seoul Mapo-dong” are referred to as “Wdong”): The starting date of expropriation: The amount indicated in the column of the amount of compensation for expropriation: [Attachment] - The amount indicated in the column of the amount of compensation for expropriation: the National Land Appraisal Corporation, the National Land Appraisal Corporation, and the same Certified Land Appraisal Corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on December 22, 2016 - The Plaintiffs raised an objection to request the increase of compensation for each of the instant lands and goods as stipulated in the adjudication on expropriation, thereby partially increasing compensation for losses, and the increased compensation for losses are as stated in the attached Table [Attachment].

- An appraisal corporation: the first appraisal corporation and the Albiban appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "appraisal for an objection"); the appraisal corporation together with the appraisal corporation for an acceptance; the appraisal corporation shall be referred to as the "appraisal for an objection"; the appraisal result of the objection shall be referred to as the "appraisal for an objection"; and the appraisal result of the appraisal for an acceptance shall be referred to as the "appraisal for an objection"; the appraisal of an objection shall be referred to as the "appraisal for an adjudication" along with the appraisal result for an acceptance

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The 1st Plaintiffs’ assertion and appraisal by the parties are calculated at a lower rate of compensation for each of the instant lands, buildings, etc., and the Defendant shall pay the difference with the reasonable compensation to the Plaintiffs.