logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.10.28 2014고합160
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of twenty thousand won or more;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2014, at the front of the E market located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant discovered the victim F (n, 17 years old) who was mixed, and followed the victim, carried the victim's left part with his left hand, and stored the victim's trify in a space between the trifs.

As a result, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the F prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (victim mobile route return), investigative reports (location of suspect mobile routes, copies of pocketbooks near police officers other than suspect inspections, police officers’ surface photographs, etc.), and drillings (CCTV CD attachment);

1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the selection of applicable laws and punishment for the crime;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 21 (2) and (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

5. The proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse / / [the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse / [the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse / [the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse / [the Defendant did not have any criminal history, including the same sexual crime committed before the instant crime was committed, and the Defendant committed the instant crime contingently under the influence of alcohol. As such, it is unnecessary to impose security measures such as an order to disclose and notify personal information on the Defendant is unnecessary because it is difficult to deem the Defendant to have a habit of sexual crime or to have a risk of repeating a crime, ② The disclosure and notification of personal information on the Defendant and his/her family members are considerably high in the degree of infringement of legal interests (see

arrow