Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving service of a Bppon-type passenger vehicle.

On July 1, 2013, the Defendant driving the said vehicle as a business on July 1, 2013, and driving the said vehicle at a speed of 40 kilometers per hour by using a three-lane road in front of the 'direct mountain zone' in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, in the direction of a speed of 40 kilometers per hour.

At that place, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed in advance to the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle, to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by checking the front side, the left, and the left well, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded straightly in violation of the red signals signals in the front direction, and the Defendant was able to take part of the Dpad wheeler and the pentum part of the Defendant’s front wheeler in front of the front direction of the vehicle driven by the victim C driving at the right-hand and left-hand turn turn to the right-hand turn at the intersection of the accident site, namely, the direct go-on from the front side of the Madon drive to the front direction of the vehicle in front of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury that requires two-time medical treatment, such as salt ties and tension in the bones of wood, respectively, from the victim C and the victim E, who is the driver of the damaged vehicle, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of statutes to copies of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes are a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims C with heavier penalty.