beta
Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. On a selective basis of the summary of the facts charged:
A. On June 2014, the Defendant calls to the victim B, who is ever in the French site, and calls to the victim B, “this is difficult at present because of the rent-type loan. Under the name of the Defendant, the mother (C) of Madin (C) obtained a loan of a deposit money under the name of she is difficult to do so, and the mother of Madin (C) has set up a Madin apartment, thereby entering the house. The deposit of a deposit money is to enter the house. The loan of the deposit money is delivered directly to the house and immediately transfers it to the financial institution that the house owner received the loan at the expiration of the lease term. Of the deposit money, the remainder of the deposit money will be resolved and interest will also be paid.”
However, the defendant only thought to use the money borrowed under the name of the victim after return from the owner of the house, and there was no intention to reside in the above E Apartment.
On July 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) caused the victim to borrow KRW 80,000 from F to borrow money as a full-time loan; (c) obtained KRW 79,935,00 from D’s wife on the same day; and (d) acquired KRW 79,935,00 from D’s wife C; and (c) acquired the money from D’s wife.
B. On July 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant would receive a loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the
However, the defendant only thought that he will receive and use the money borrowed under the name of the victim from the owner of the house, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money borrowed under the name of the loan.
On July 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) caused the victim to borrow KRW 80,000 from F to borrow money as a full-time loan; (c) obtained KRW 79,935,00 from D’s wife on the same day; and (d) acquired KRW 79,935,00 from D’s wife C; and (c) acquired the money from D’s wife.
2. Determination.