Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On January 14, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:00, and got the front of the vegetation distance in front of the vegetation, which is located in the grative Dong-gu, Seosan-gu, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, to turn to the left according to one-lane of the front patrol box at the front of

Since there is a place where crosswalks and signals are installed, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to protect pedestrians while driving the crosswalks according to signals.

Nevertheless, by negligence of failing to turn to the left in contravention of the signal, the Defendant took part of the right shoulder part of the victim D (the age of 26, n) crossing according to the pedestrian signal as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and continued to turn to the right side of the victim’s bridge toward the front left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the cutting of the body frame and the bones of mast, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2);

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. An accident-related photograph;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of details of damage) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant subscribed to a comprehensive insurance; and (c) the victim did not wish to punish by agreement with the victim; and (d) the extent of