logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.06.24 2019고단273
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2019, around 05:55, the Defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act by force, as the Defendant took the sexual organ of the victim D (Nam, 28 years of age) who was out of clothes inside the “Crhoba” male waters room in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, with his hand, and took the sexual organ of the victim D (ma, 28 years of age) as his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Order to complete program (the accused is a disabled person of Grade II with a mental handicap under special circumstances in which order to complete program cannot be imposed);

1. Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the grounds of a criminal fact stated in the judgment on the registration of personal information of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the head of

Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse shall not issue an disclosure order or notification order to the accused pursuant to the following, comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type, motive, process, disclosure order or notification order of the instant crime, the degree of disadvantage the Defendant suffers from, and the effect of preventing sex crimes subject to registration that may be achieved therefrom, and protecting the victims.

The reason for sentencing seems to have a lot of mental impulses suffered by the victim due to the instant crime.

However, the defendant is a disabled person with a second degree of mental retardation disability, and this mental disorder seems to have affected the crime of this case.

b) the Commission;

arrow