Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2014, at around 20:25, the Defendant reported 112 that this form of “A vehicle parked in front of the Gyeonggi-do City,” and reported 112, “A vehicle parked in front of the Singu, Gyeonggi-do, was sent to any person.” The Defendant reported the shape of the Defendant who interfered with the reporter’s hearing of the reporter’s statement by F, who was dispatched to the E-gu, the Singu, the E-gu, the Singu, the E-gu, the Singu, the E-gu, the E-gu, would be a tree of the Defendant who obstructed the reporter’s hearing of the reporter’s statement. However, the Defendant sawd the F, etc. with the f’s f’s fage, which

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to the victim F and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to work days and copies of identification cards;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is alleged to the effect that, at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant was in a state of mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the instant crime. However, in light of the content, process, etc. of the instant crime, it does not seem that the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the instant crime.

The reason for sentencing is that it is necessary to strictly punish the victims with the knowledge that the victims were police officers in uniform at the time of the crime of this case, and thus obstructing the victims' legitimate performance of official duties. However, the defendant's criminal act is divided, the defendant appears to have committed the crime under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case in Korea in addition to the crime of this case.