logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.07 2016나2014636
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Industrial Bank of Korea and the Korea ethylex (hereinafter “Korea ethylex”) were loaned by the Industrial Bank of Korea as listed below.

(1) Loans for small and medium enterprises 20,300,300,000 30,000,000 1,088,000, 445, 248, 240,00,000,000, 1,008, 245, 240, 1666, 70,869, 852,066, 207, 305, 2064, 206, 205, 205, 206, 306, 205, 204, 205, 206, 305, 207, 205, 205, 206, 306, 406, 306, 205, 205, 205, 206, 207, 205, 2005, 2636,

B. The Industrial Bank of Korea established a mortgage contract between the Industrial Bank of Korea and Korea ethylex shall enter into a mortgage contract with regard to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Korea ethylex (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as shown in the following table: the Industrial Bank of Korea completed the registration of the establishment of each of the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on December 27, 2009, listed in the separate sheet No. 1613, Jun. 26, 2008, No. 10656, Jun. 108, 2008, regarding the receipt number, maximum debt amount, as stated in the separate sheet No. 1615, Dec. 16, 2008, as stated in the separate sheet No. 1615, Feb. 27, 2008, each of the instant real estate completed the registration of the establishment of a mortgage on February 27, 2009.

C. As the Korea Industrial Bank of Korea failed to repay the loans, such as application for auction of the Industrial Bank of Korea and the acquisition of the Defendant’s bonds, the Industrial Bank of Korea is the instant real estate.

arrow