All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is engaged in driving of B-2 cargo vehicles.

On July 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 09:00, and proceeded toward the direction of the two-lanes in front of the D funeral home in the wife population C, according to the direction of the port from the port of permissible terminal.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering and steering system by accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in proceeding on the front bank, and received the back portion of the FST3 car of the victim E (MM3) driving in the front bank.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim E, the victim G (V, 50 years of age) who is a passenger of the above SM3 car, with approximately two weeks of treatment, such as dump feries and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment for the same victim H (V, 47 years of age), and the same victim H (V, 57 years of age). In addition, the Defendant suffered from the injury, such as dump feries, which caused about three weeks of treatment for about three weeks of treatment for the same victim I.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

B. Submission of each written agreement on November 27, 2019 to the effect that the victim E would not be punished on January 7, 2020 after institution of the prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;