logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.11.28 2013고단446
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2013, Defendant A: (a) provided a large number of unspecified customers, such as F, with a 20 game machine, from that time, and exchanged the remaining points of the game in cash, at his/her own residence located in the first patrolman E; and (b) provided a large number of customers, such as F, with a 20 game machine from that time until February 5, 2013.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified to customers for their use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products.

2. On February 2013, the Defendants, along with G, conspiredd with G to have a game machine installed in H and the first floor, with the intent of having them run a game room. G provided funds necessary for the establishment of a amusement room and vehicles necessary for soliciting customers. Defendant A, while managing the overall operation of a amusement room, was driving the vehicle, and Defendant B, who was in charge of coffee and exchange work, was 120,000 won per day, and was under control and was in charge of coffee and exchange work, had the intent to serve as the “brone president”, which is the actual owner of the business.

From February 2013 to March 19:40, 2013, the Defendants, along with G, equipped with 20 game machine for “sea-to-sea-to-sea” in the said entertainment room with 20 game machine and provided many unspecified customers, such as I visiting the said room with 20 game machine for use, and exchanged the remaining points after performing the game in cash.

As a result, the Defendants provided game products without rating classification in collusion with G for customers' use and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The full or partial statement of a witness G, I and J respectively;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mobile analysis data;

1. The Defendants: Article 44(1)2 and Article 32 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry.

arrow