A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and D, on April 10, 1989, were married on April 10, 1989, but D, around February 5, 2017, filed a divorce lawsuit on the 15th of the same month.

1. Crimes using credit cards in the name of D [Fraud, theft] Defendant has been used by himself;

D’s modern, new, and Samsung Credit Card No. D’s loss report made it impossible to use it more, and in the operation of entertainment establishments at Anyang city, E and publically conspired with the card company for the purpose of using the credit card in the name of D by letting the name-free boxes (E; hereinafter “E”) known in the name of Anyang city (E; hereinafter “E”) make phone call to the card company with the mobile phone (F) opened in the name of A and using it for re-issuance of the credit card in the name of A.

(a) Payment [Fraud] - Hyundai Card and New Card related (1) The Defendant, at the place of vision on March 2017, made the above E to call to the customer counseling department of the Modern Card with the above mobile phone to re-issue the Madern Card in the name of D, which was reported to be lost, and then made the above card to re-issue the same year by using the above card.

3. 3. The purchase of the goods at G stores in G stores paid KRW 2,150,00,000 from that time to March 1 of the same month and paid KRW 5,565,687 through 52 times in total under the pretext of payment, such as the daily list of crimes (1) in attached Form No. 1.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, induced victims' member stores and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above settlement amount.

(2) On March 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) called the said E to the customer counseling department of the said card with the said mobile phone; and (b) requested the said E to reissue a new D card under the name of D, which was reported as D; (c) used the said card to pay KRW 1,400,000 when purchasing goods at H agency around the 25th day of the same month; and (d) from around that time to around the 29th day of the same month, the Defendant paid KRW 1,40,000 as a result of the purchase of goods at H agency around the same month; and (d) 4,180 times in total under the name of payment, such as the weather table (2) from that time to the day