The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the defendant, who is erroneous in the facts, did not purchase the Metetop Mete from a person who is not the name, the court below recognized it and sentenced the defendant to collect additional collection on the premise of purchase. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) Determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts in light of the date, place, etc. of the crime as stated in the facts charged in this case, the facts charged in this case was administered by the defendant, and the defendant's purchase of the Mept is the process of the crime and the facts charged, and it is difficult to view that the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts against the judgment below is a legitimate assertion of mistake of facts.

2) In light of the Defendant’s statement in the investigation agency, etc., there is an error in the judgment of the court below that sentenced the collection on the ground that the Defendant’s statement in the part of the collection is equivalent to KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. It is recognized that the number of times of the Defendant’s medication is limited to one time, etc. in determining the unfair argument of sentencing.

However, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime including the previous offense, the defendant is serving a repeated term, and the age, sex and environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, this part

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.