logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.10 2014노1385
약사법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

A pharmacy founder of the instant facts charged cannot sell drugs or acquire drugs for sales purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

A. On April 4, 2013, at the D adult shop operated by the Defendant’s operator located in Kuju-si, the purpose of which is to sell 10,000 g 30 g g 100 g g 300 g g 200,000 won from supply books E (total 300 g g g 300 g g g g g g g

B. At around April 12, 2013, 100 g 30 g 10,000 g 20,000 g c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c

C. Around May 3, 2013, at the above adult product shop, 10,000 g 10,000 g 10,000 g g 20,000 won for the purpose of selling 10,000 g g 10,000 g g 30,000 g g from the above E.

The judgment of the court below reversed the defendant's statement to the effect that although it is recognized that the defendant received certain goods from E on the date and time indicated in the above facts charged, the defendant sent them to the defendant in each of the above facts charged, he stated that he sent them to the police testimony, each of the above facts charged, but sold fake, etc. in several places, such as the defendant sold fake, since he had sold them to the defendant, the court below reversed the statement to the effect that he did not memory whether he sold fake over three times as stated in the above facts charged. Upon examining the E's police statement and the sales details arranged in the police investigation process, E appears to have stated the sales volume of fake sales volume and stated in accordance with the general market price based on the objective data, such as books and specifications, etc. at the time.

arrow