The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant G shall be reversed.

Defendant

G shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and ten months.

Defendant

A.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by Defendant A (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s sentence (two years of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

(c)

Defendant

C Punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable (the defendant withdrawn his assertion of mistake).

Defendant

D1) The judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by applying the joint principal principal theory to the public offering, although the Defendant did not actually deliver the passbook to be used for the crime of the instant Bosing. The judgment below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

E. Defendant E’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

F. The sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant F (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

G. Defendant G1) In relation to the crime of fraud and attempted fraud, the Defendant did not have conspired to commit the instant Bosing crime, and the part other than the passbook that the Defendant transferred was entirely unrelated to the Defendant. However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine and misapprehending the legal doctrine on the whole of the facts charged.

B) As to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault), although the defendant was found to have pushed the victim and breathed, the defendant did not have assaulted the victim jointly with AY, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts and in the misapprehension of legal principles.

C) The judgment of the court below convicting the Defendant of this part of the facts charged, even though the Defendant did not intend to flee, with respect to the crime of obstructing the performance of special duties and damaging special public goods.