Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s mother, the mother of the Plaintiff, is the E Association on May 31, 1996 (hereinafter “E”).
B) The interest rate of KRW 50,00,000 was KRW 16 per annum, and damages for delay was paid KRW 50,000,000 by borrowing with applying the fluctuation rate. The Plaintiffs jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligations of KRW 50,00,000 between Plaintiff B and E on the same day as the loan agreement of Section 1 of the above paragraph. The Plaintiffs received KRW 50,000,000 under the same condition as the loan agreement of Section 1.
D and Plaintiff A jointly guaranteed the Plaintiff B’s debt of the loan.
[1] Each of the loan contracts of this case was written on May 31, 1998, when the maturity date of each of the loan contracts of this case was 24 months, on the ledger of general loan of this case, managed as computerized data, including the loan contracts of this case (hereinafter referred to as "each of the loan contracts of this case" in paragraphs (1) and (2). (3) Each of the loan contracts of this case was written on May 31, 1998. On the contrary, the plaintiffs and D signed as the debtor or joint guarantor (hereinafter referred to as "each of the loan contracts of this case").
For the following:
B. (1) At the time of the application for voluntary auction as referred to in paragraph (1), the maturity date was indicated as May 31, 1997. (b) On August 4, 1997, E received a dividend of KRW 14,490,09,09 as a creditor and mortgagee on January 13, 199, and appropriated for the repayment of overdue interest for each of the loans of this case on the ground that the maturity date under each of the loan contracts of this case was on May 31, 1997, and that the Plaintiffs and D joint ownership did not repay their obligations, even though the maturity date was due.
E on July 20, 1999