logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.06.03 2012가합7078
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts are without dispute between the parties, or evidence of subparagraph 1-1 through 10, evidence of subparagraph 2-2 through 5, evidence of subparagraph 3-1-4, evidence of subparagraph 5-1 through 3, evidence of subparagraph 6-1 through 8, evidence of subparagraph 13-1 through 6, evidence of subparagraph 14-1 through 4, evidence of subparagraph 15-1, 2, Eul, 2-1, 2-3, evidence of subparagraph 2-3, evidence of subparagraph 5, evidence of subparagraph 7-1 through 7, evidence of subparagraph 7-1 through 3, evidence of subparagraph 8-1 through 3, evidence of subparagraph 12, and evidence of subparagraph 14-1 through 4, evidence of subparagraph 15-2, and evidence of subparagraph 15-3, evidence of subparagraph 2-3, evidence of subparagraph 7-1 through 3, evidence of subparagraph 8-1 through 12, and evidence of subparagraph 18.

After establishing a framework plan for sewerage maintenance in the passenger zone around January 22, 1996, the Plaintiff concluded a comprehensive technical development agreement with the Defendant Saman Co., Ltd., a joint venture body organized on June 22, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Design Co., Ltd.”) to extend the contract amount from the 59-1,185,36,000,000,000 square meters of the facility capacity to treat the sewage from the 40,000 cubic meters of the facility capacity to the 59-1, Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si, and to change the existing facility to the high-level disposal facility for the purpose of preparing for the increase in sewage generation amount and improving the water quality of discharged water, and to change the existing facility to the 1,185,360,000,000 won to the basic disposal facility and working design service (hereinafter referred to as the “standard technical development agreement”). From June 26, 2005, the Plaintiff concluded the comprehensive technical development agreement with the Defendant Co.

The joint and several surety of the Defendant designer, and the main contents of the instant design contract are as follows.

(1) The scope of the task shall be within the scope of the basic and detailed design sewage treatment plant facilities (18,00 cubic meters/day) and existing.

arrow