1. The part concerning the claim for reinstatement among the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) the annexed list;

1. Indication of claims: To be as specified in attached Form 1;

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Partial rejection or dismissal.

A. In civil procedure, the purport of the claim is to be stated in the complaint as necessary for the subject matter of lawsuit and the court’s determination scope, etc., so that the contents and scope of the claim can be clearly identified.

However, among the lawsuits in this case, the claim for restitution does not specify the scope and contents of the “reusal”, and it cannot be deemed that the claim for damages in lieu of reinstatement is not clearly specified, since the cost required for reinstatement is not specified. Therefore, the claim for restitution is unlawful.

B. The plaintiff sought payment of the unpaid management expenses of KRW 236,980, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.