Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C (ma, 24 years old, Vietnam) are married couple around June 2016.

On August 1, 2017, from around 19:30 to 21:10, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in 105 dong 603, Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi-si, Jeonsi-si, the Defendant saw the Defendant as Vietnam fishing, and (b) the Defendant saw the Defendant as standing on the table while drinking.

“In spite of the fact that he did not hear the victim’s horses, the victim’s 11-day scam with the hand floor, and the victim scamed on the 1st floor of the apartment in order to get out of the victim, the victim scams and scams the head and scams depending on the victim. The victim continued to have his head and scam in the front floor of the apartment, with the head of the victim scam in the vicinity of the apartment house, the victim scam scams by scam in the entrance, and the face scamscams were faced by the victim scams at the entrance, and the victim’s scamscam and scambbbbbbbbbbs caused the victim’s scam in the house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A photograph of damaged parts and a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (a copy of victim's pocket book and attachment of counseling records for rest);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant had a dispute with the victim at home with the victim, and the victim was living in the apartment complex with the victim, and the victim was living in the apartment complex, and the victim was living in the house of large interest because he was living in the apartment site, and the victim was able to get out of the house of large interest. Thus, there was no price for the victim.